Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Money: The Road to Hell?

Ask anyone on the street about the problems that we face as a society today, ask them philosophically what is wrong and you will get a response like "corporate greed", "money is the root of all evil", "government corruption", "loss of common morals and ethics", perhaps even "racial hatred" or "the environment".

Money very well may be the root of all evil. I would argue that fear itself is the root of all evil. Money is a source of power, which can be used for good or evil. Fear of the "money power" has lead us down a path to evil.

You don't have to buy a certain brand of toothpaste, processed foods or a brand new car, or even drive a car for that matter. If it is corporate greed that is your answer, the real problem is likely that you just haven't looked in the mirror. Although corporations are occasional mistresses of government, a technological society requires this. If we want better cars and better computers then companies need co-operation from governments. These kinds of things require planning and large capital investments and a knowledge of future conditions. Voter pressure can prevent this when necessary or mitigate it. Better rules for lobbyists could be written.

In the case of environmentalism, the stated case of carbon dioxide has been self contradictory. It is nothing more than a set of examples of various propaganda techniques. Fortunately, many people have had the time and the inclination to look at both sides of the argument, and believers in any man made carbon dioxide ruining the environment theories have been virtually laughed out of existence. "Consensus", a well known propaganda technique, still has a few, including corporate media, still holding onto the nightmare or the dream, depending on which side of the United Nations banking counter one is standing. Most of the consensus is among establishment biologists and doctorates of business administration by rumor while virtually endless career atmospheric physicists are telling us it's a lie, in person, in YouTube presentations and lectures that you never hear about on corporate media. No one has a scorched earth policy and if the debate was truly over you wouldn't hear actual qualified scientists saying its a scam and doing damage to their own careers as a result.

Carbon is the one thing that remains constant in environmentalism. It causes global cooling when there is cooling, it causes global warming when there is warming. It causes temperature instabilities when cooling becomes warming or warming becomes cooling. Their models do not include the sun and clouds until recently.

Environmentalism is motivated by the fact that the financial powers beleive that a far better replacement for the war model of society would be to tax carbon. The war model needs to be replaced. Tax carbon and you tax and control life itself, more taxation will be required to support a growing debt - which is the central problem. That is the motivation of our controllers that is behind UN/Corporate environmentalism.

Political corruption is a popular answer, as if politicians, by their very nature are corrupt and that it is not the rules of the political environment that make them behave as they do. People expect politicians to jump into a pool of water without getting wet. They name certain politicians as corrupt and causing particular problems, always looking at individual trees instead of the forest, or rather, the ground that the forest depends on. Every politician elected gets labeled as corrupt by large segments of the population. People continue to visit the polls. All we have to do is elect the right candidate. All politicians must write legislation to tax the public to service the growing debt.

The answer to our problems is not philosophical, it's empirical and all the problems we face can be traced to a single source. There is the monetary reformist illustration of a group of doctors looking over a patient. One says "it's in the heart", another says "it's in the liver", another one says "it's the digestive tract". Multiple seemingly unrelated symptoms may be traced to a single problem with the blood supply. In our organic society, money serves the purpose of blood and carries energy to each of the organs.

In 1913, United States was effectively taken over by private interests. Private banks began to create interest bearing fiat currency to finance government in the form of the Federal Reserve Act. Although many people argue that the private Federal Reserve bank is effectively governed, it is a private corporation for a reason. If it was governed by the peoples "representatives" and in people's interest, it wouldn't be privately owned. It is privately owned, therefore works in the interest of it's owners. Part of the deal the government has with the private central bank is that it may borrow as much as it wishes. It does not need permission from the public. Public control of interest rates, or reduction of interest rates to near zero would not change the inherent character of the system - the inherent characteristic of debt based system is that it must collapse at some point.

Government has a permanent partner and is always in bed with private bankers. Corporations are only overnight guests that can be kicked out of bed at any time with public pressure or lobbyist reform. Government must always serve two masters, one being the banks that manage the economy and the other being the voting public and it is here that the problem in its most basic sense resides. No one can truly serve two masters.

Aristotle explains that society always has an oligarchy and that oligarchy has a different set of hopes, dreams and aspirations than ordinary people under democratic and republic governments. (In the case of a benevolent philosopher king, this conflict is eliminated). Plato illustrates society from an oligarchical point of view with members of the controlling oligarchy answering questions brought forward by Socrates regarding the subject of justice.

The Republic Of Plato is a dream or a nightmare, depending on your station in life. In our modern democracies and republics, a controlling oligarchy controls the money supply and therefore governments. He who has the gold rules. It will soon be a nightmare for even the technocrats who will argue and support the system to their last breath as the ballooning debt creates more bills to be written into laws to create the income to service the always growing debt. The very idea of privately funded governments with interest bearing currency, along with the basic character of any oligarchy with it's need of self preservation alone guarantees this. One need not look for empirical evidence.

Mao Tse Tung once said in the New York Times he would get TV's in homes in Communist China. Communist China had the same degree of control of their people, but required armed soldiers to be everywhere. Mass propaganda is a cheaper and simpler control mechanism. We live in a propaganda driven state that creates a set of fears that blinds people to the common link of all fears, just as a deer is blinded from seeing the side of the road when being approached by headlights on a highway.

It is fear itself that creates an individual that is most receptive to propaganda and everyone knows that propaganda can be used to create fear. Corporate media, think-tank and unaccountable tax free NGO's created and propaganda driven phoney terrorism and phoney environmentalism create a myriad of fears. No one can escape propaganda, and asking anyone to define would be like asking a fish to define water. Propaganda is ubiquitous, from public education to suggestive entertainment media to the "bubble headed bleached blond"[1] on the set on the eleven o'clock news every night. The fears create ostensible reasons to write more legislation.

Its not what they say, it's what they do not say. People graduate public school and post secondary education without even a slight understanding of politics or economics. A few people know what a Keynesian economic system is and how, in its current form is shaped to serve a controlling oligarchy, those who own the banks and control the money supply. Almost no one knows what "debt money" is, it is like J.K. Galbraith said "...it warps the mind...". Few people understand that the current monetary system must in fact collapse at some point in time.

People talk about what scares them and the nature of the monetary system isn't scary, at least until it is understood. It is ubiquitous, yet not immediate. Cancer is a fear, most people fear the decline of the economy. Fear is as ubiquitous in our lives as is propaganda. It forms our objective consciousness and the subjective entertainment media provides an escape.

Most common politicians have almost no background in formal understanding of political science, the true nature of the monetary system or even know that "Law" is not synonymous with "Legal". They are as much victims of both propaganda and the small box thinking of common technocrats as everyone else. Only a few politicians at the federal level even know what United Nations Agenda 21 is.

The necessity of a propaganda driven society is a direct consequence of the monetary system. The type on monetary system in modern Western democracies is the worse kind of monetary system imaginable. This same system has been spread around the world through all the wars of this century. The World Bank and IMF lend money to all countries now, with the exception of Syria and North Korea. Countries that have been said to stand against the USA have printed their own money. "War is fought for money"[2]

If everyone tuned into this specific problem the money establishment would be in serious trouble. The phoney threat of environmental disaster has many people that care about anything outside themselves living in fear, locked in the headlights and unable to see the root of their fear and the solution to eliminate it. They trust their gods, the scientists, in corporate media. A scientist without corporate media approval has no credibility. They will say they do not automatically believe everything they hear, but they do, as long as the message is delivered by an approved scientists. Its as if scientists on TV have been given a truth serum and cannot lie because "science doesn't lie". The Left has become non-intellectual and non thinking because they live in fear.

The idea that natural contractions in the economy can be fixed with more loans to governments is the basic premise of Keynesian macro-economics. The economy expands while incurring a greater and greater debt, requiring more and more expansion. Contractions can be fixed with more loans. The contraction of the economy in 1929 lead to the chapter 11 bankruptcy of the governments in 1933. There is no longer enough money in the economy to pay the Federal debt. Governments are now operated by private financial institutions. Policy is written by the think tanks of the banking system.

Interest bearing loans made to governments by private sources as well as consumer loans made by private sources require a constantly expanding economy. Every dollar in circulation bears interest for private interest. The money in your pocket is earning interest for someone, someone else is making these payments. A constantly expanding economy is necessary in the form of more loans so that interest payments on the money in circulation can be made. Both the government and the people are insolvent, due to the fact that there is simply not enough money in circulation to pay back all of the loans.

There is no reason for the ultra rich to believe their share of this debt is equal to that of the middle classes, and every reason not think on these terms. Assets that are created from debt money are not owned by their "registered owners". They can be taken away anytime with the stoke of a pen in the form of a new act or statute created from a bill submitted to congress or parliament. We all know perfectly well what a bill is. In this sense the Legalist terminology is not obscure.

The Legal system provides an ostensible reason for assets to be taken from their owners, but the very fact that they can shows that the people do not own the assets they work and pay for with what money they have after being robbed with the fraudulent "income tax".

The money that any one who is not an owner of the private Federal Reserve has in their hands is not theirs. If I lend someone something of mine, and they sell it to someone else, that thing is still mine. The money is not lawfully ours because we agree that this debt actually exists. But there is no actual value associated with the money that lies outside the fact that people work for it. But every dollar worked for is owed, therefore not the property of its holder in a lawful (rational) sense.

It is a maxim of law that a debtor has no rights. Law has been built on custom and that custom is referred to as the Law Merchant, the customs, rationally developed to facilitate commerce, the true purpose of laws. The world is a lawful place, this is necessary to support commerce but the word "law" by definition means almost "Absolute Truth", but not quite, it's built on maxims that are rational and is therefore rational. Most people think in a Legalist context and cannot see the irrationality and absurdity from which the Legal system operates. They see delays in the courts, attorneys, politicians and judges getting away with murder, but cannot link this to something seemingly unrelated, such as phoney terrorism, phoney environmentalism or the rise in cancer, just as a heart problem may be understood to be unrelated to the liver.

Lawfully the money has no value outside peoples willingness to work for it. The privately owned banks do not add a substantive value to the money, only the people do. Therefore the debt is not owed. Ignorance of law creates the debt.

The Legal system was first conceived in ancient China and was created to obfuscate rational law on behalf of a ruling class. The Legalist's were shortly overthrown by the Confucianism. Propaganda and the careful use of language by our programmers has made the term "Legal" synonymous with the word law. Law and money are part of the same system. If the money is debt based and designed to separate the people from the products of their labour, the legal system must support and justify this. The word "represent" as our attorneys and politicians do for us, is not synonymous with "act in our interest". Attorneys and politicians obfusgate the true nature of the system and the fact that their job is to attorn our assets over to the financial institutions. An attorney is not the same thing as a lawyer and there are no lawyers. An attorney will protect your legal rights, but cannot protect your lawful rights because only debtors have attorneys. "The first thing we do is kill all the lawyers".

On the private side, you buying a car, fiat currency and fractional reserve banking gives low interest rates and makes sense. Debt based money can make sense, borrowing drives the economy. It permits business minded people to rise above their current station in life. A gold standard without fractional reserve banking would have interest rates too high for commoners to borrow. Fractional reserve banking creates the dream and the freedom that many people once had. It is a logical and fair system that benefits everyone.

Fractional reserve banking does not create the problem we face. The problem is privately funded governments and their constant need to raise more tax money to service an always expanding debt. Threats to public safety provide an ostensible reason to increase taxation and service the debt. Taxing carbon is ideal for this task.

The only chance of recovery is to change the monetary system from a debt based system to an asset based system. This will create an environment where people do own their own money and therefore the assets which they purchase. True property rights could be restored. Asset money based systems can take many forms. The next article in this series, "Money: Experimenting With Heaven" will explain the benefits of an asset based monetary system.

In solving any problem the first step is to define it. It is bad thinking to believe that a problem cannot be solved before it is defined. It is also bad thinking to believe that if a problem is defined, and you do not have a solution, then no one has a solution. It is my belief that if this problem was well understood, a solution would appear, since the money system that will destroy our economy is based on a lie.

[1] Dirty Laundry (Don Henly)
[2] The Republic Of Plato


The Technological Society by Jaques Ellul
Aristotle "The Politic"
John Kenneth Galbraith "Money: Whence It Came, Where It Went"
The Report From Iron Mountain (free PDF)
Club Of Rome: The Next Global Revolution (free PDF online)
Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars (free PDF online)

Monday, December 29, 2014

SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN Full DOCUMENTary 1878-2006 by A.C.Hitchcock

iframe width 480 height 270 src https://www.youtube.com/embed/XuzkLbHb1Q8 frameborder 0 allowfullscreen> /iframe>

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

About Climate Skeptics

re Climate Skeptics About section on websites:

"The goal of Skeptical Science is to explain what peer reviewed science has to say about global warming. When you peruse the many arguments of global warming skeptics, a pattern emerges. Skeptic arguments tend to focus on narrow pieces of the puzzle while neglecting the broader picture. For example, focus on Climategate emails neglects the full weight of scientific evidence for man-made global warming."

We focus on the lies and the little facts that can falsify arguments. Its up to the folks that are putting forth the hypothesis to come up with unfalsifiable evidence and its up to us to falsify those arguments. That's how science works. If anywhere in your hypothesis it says "2+2=5" and we point it out then we win. Its that simple. Climate fascists have to correct their work, not accuse us of not "looking at the broader picture". There have been some huge lies and/or errors. One can watch the movie Global Warming or Global Governance or The Great Global Warming Swindle to see what real climate scientists say about the practice of science inside the UN's IPCC.

We do not have to look at big pictures, only find little lies and sometimes big lies. Bad data collection is a form of lie. If the pro ACCer's are intentionally misleading and twisting and changing their arguments we only need to point that out.

This "about" section shows how little climate skeptics knows about science, or how stupid they think their readers are. More than likely, the latter.

Later in the same page it states:

"Skeptical Science is maintained by John Cook, the Climate Communication Fellow for the Global Change Institute at the University of Queensland. He studied physics at the University of Queensland, Australia. After graduating, he majored in solar physics in his post-grad honours year."

So obviously this guy isn't stupid when it comes to science. He just thinks his readers are.

You can never underestimate the greenies lack of understanding when it comes to science. Many claim to be looking at the science when they have only a bachelors degree in something like biology. Climate Science is applied math, and understood at this level by a very few. Fortunately, for our side, we only have to point out the lies and where they say "2+2=5". I know it doesn't seem fair to the twisted leftist mind, but its just logic.

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

James Traficant RIP September 27, 2014

His own words...

"Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11. Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. Government. We are setting forth hopefully, a blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a coroner’s report that will lead to our demise.

It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 - Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.

The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War Powers. With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now dissolved, the receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: "The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States."

Gold and silver were such a powerful money during the founding of the united states of America, that the founding fathers declared that only gold or silver coins can be "money" in America. Since gold and silver coinage were heavy and inconvenient for a lot of transactions, they were stored in banks and a claim check was issued as a money substitute. People traded their coupons as money, or "currency." Currency is not money, but a money substitute. Redeemable currency must promise to pay a dollar equivalent in gold or silver money. Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) make no such promises, and are not "money." A Federal Reserve Note is a debt obligation of the federal United States government, not "money." The federal United States government and the U.S. Congress were not and have never been authorized by the Constitution for the united states of America to issue currency of any kind, but only lawful money, gold and silver coin.

It is essential that we comprehend the distinction between real money and paper money substitute. One cannot get rich by accumulating money substitutes, one can only get deeper into debt. We the People no longer have any "money." Most Americans have not been paid any "money" for a very long time, perhaps not in their entire life. Now do you comprehend why you feel broke? Now, do you understand why you are "bankrupt," along with the rest of the country?

Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) are unsigned checks written on a closed account. FRNs are an inflatable paper system designed to create debt through inflation (devaluation of currency). when ever there is an increase of the supply of a money substitute in the economy without a corresponding increase in the gold and silver backing, inflation occurs.

Inflation is an invisible form of taxation that irresponsible governments inflict on their citizens. The Federal Reserve Bank who controls the supply and movement of FRNs has everybody fooled. They have access to an unlimited supply of FRNs, paying only for the printing costs of what they need. FRNs are nothing more than promissory notes for U.S. Treasury securities (T-Bills) - a promise to pay the debt to the Federal Reserve Bank.

There is a fundamental difference between "paying" and "discharging" a debt. To pay a debt, you must pay with value or substance (i.e. gold, silver, barter or a commodity). With FRNs, you can only discharge a debt. You cannot pay a debt with a debt currency system. You cannot service a debt with a currency that has no backing in value or substance. No contract in Common law is valid unless it involves an exchange of "good & valuable consideration." Unpayable debt transfers power and control to the sovereign power structure that has no interest in money, law, equity or justice because they have so much wealth already.

Their lust is for power and control. Since the inception of central banking, they have controlled the fates of nations.

The Federal Reserve System is based on the Canon law and the principles of sovereignty protected in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In fact, the international bankers used a "Canon Law Trust" as their model, adding stock and naming it a "Joint Stock Trust." The U.S. Congress had passed a law making it illegal for any legal "person" to duplicate a "Joint Stock Trust" in 1873. The Federal Reserve Act was legislated post-facto (to 1870), although post-facto laws are strictly forbidden by the Constitution. [1:9:3]

The Federal Reserve System is a sovereign power structure separate and distinct from the federal United States government. The Federal Reserve is a maritime lender, and/or maritime insurance underwriter to the federal United States operating exclusively under Admiralty/Maritime law. The lender or underwriter bears the risks, and the Maritime law compelling specific performance in paying the interest, or premiums are the same.

Assets of the debtor can also be hypothecated (to pledge something as a security without taking possession of it.) as security by the lender or underwriter. The Federal Reserve Act stipulated that the interest on the debt was to be paid in gold. There was no stipulation in the Federal Reserve Act for ever paying the principle.

Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913)

"Hypothecated" all property within the federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, -in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a "beneficiary" of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their "subjects," the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System.

In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federal United States corporation all the credit "money substitute" it needed. Like any other debtor, the federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the federal United States didn’t have any assets, they assigned the private property of their "economic slaves", the U.S. citizens as collateral against the unpayable federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers.

Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution, feudal roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common people had no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are the tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the people have exchanged one master for another.

This has been going on for over eighty years without the "informed knowledge" of the American people, without a voice protesting loud enough. Now it’s easy to grasp why America is fundamentally bankrupt.

Why don’t more people own their properties outright?

Why are 90% of Americans mortgaged to the hilt and have little or no assets after all debts and liabilities have been paid? Why does it feel like you are working harder and harder and getting less and less?

We are reaping what has been sown, and the results of our harvest is a painful bankruptcy, and a foreclosure on American property, precious liberties, and a way of life. Few of our elected representatives in Washington, D.C. have dared to tell the truth. The federal United States is bankrupt. Our children will inherit this unpayable debt, and the tyranny to enforce paying it.

America has become completely bankrupt in world leadership, financial credit and its reputation for courage, vision and human rights. This is an undeclared economic war, bankruptcy, and economic slavery of the most corrupt order! Wake up America! Take back your Country." [emphasis added]


see also  http://dougplumb.blogspot.ca/2013/02/hypothecation-you-own-nothing.html

Monday, September 29, 2014

Post Modernism Dangers

(originally posted on writerbeat.com)

Yesterday I decided to have a fire in the backyard. It was after 9 PM and dark outside so I needed a flashlight to find some wood lying around. I didn't have a flashlight, but I had a smart phone. I wondered if Kirk and Spock had flashlights on their communicators.

I was watching Prof. Rick Roderick (R.I.P.) on Post Modernism earlier that day on my smart phone. I can download videos of him and sit outside and watch his talks on that tiny video display. In one talk he said that a man who thinks he is a poached egg gets convicted of lunacy solely because he is a minority. This talk took place in the mid nineties, when Nintendo was big and the internet wasn't.

Its a crazy world we live in. 9-11 was an inside job. Global warming is a fraud. How do we figure this out? Not by looking at evidence, there is too much of that. The United States and its military industrial complex had the most to gain from 9-11, they also covered up evidence. If Global Warming was not a fraud, the IPCC wouldn't have had to lie so much. The banks and the UN have a lot to gain from the lies. They would have thousands of actual climate scientists warning us of the danger and would not have to create that illusion using filtering and other techniques of propaganda, mostly outlined in Aristotle's "Rhetoric". Scientists would line up to sign their petition – if they had one.

Somehow we forgot that we shouldn't believe liars. Thankfully the biggest of lies can be destroyed by the simplest of logic. Some of us still know that.

The multicultural society we live in has no grounding in ethical or moral truth anymore. God is dead just like Nietzsche said. The best we can hope for is not go crazy ourselves, like Nietzsche eventually did. He saw a man beat a horse and that was the final straw. We see much worse all the time in the hyper reality we live in. Its no wonder people cannot tell fact from fiction. It affects all of us in various ways. You cannot cure an illness until you recognize you have one. Recognizing this illness for many will be like a fish recognizing water – the ubiquitous nature of water prevents it for the fish. The ubiquitous nature of lies that surround us prevents many of us from recognizing them.

We must ground ourselves in eternal truth, the greatest of greats, Kant, describes entering a dark room and having to hold onto something to orient himself so that he knows where he may walk without breaking anything or hurting himself.

We are conscious. Consciousness forms the Holy Ghost, God is Law and the Son, forgiveness. Its the Holy Ghost that proves the existence of God. Being, as some people call it. It's this that the bankster's UN needs to destroy – the last vestige of reality, the notion that we are conscious and responsible for our own rights and wrongs. Destroy all religion; destroy all Being; Destroy reason itself. Destruction through deconstructionism. It is necessary to bring in the grand plan of Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development / New World Order into view. People must be reduced to machines so they always do what they are told, irregardless of right and wrong.

Much damage has been done by religion when it simplified itself for the masses, it anthropomorphized itself leading to its own discredit. But what else could it have done? It's a twisted version of Plato's Meno and the seeking of faith, which cannot be understood because it lies outside the bounds of reason.

If we grab onto that one thing, consciousness, we may be able to find our way out. Start living according to the rights and wrongs we know in our souls. If we learn better what consciousness is we will know better why we must hang onto it tighter. We will see better why the Bankster's scientific Establishment needs to destroy the very notion of consciousness.

This is how we stay human in the post modern world.

Thursday, September 25, 2014

50 Climate Scientists

I've been on the Linked In discussion groups talking about global warming, climate change or whatever is fashionable for it to be called these days. These fascists have really started making me angry and my keyboard has undergone some serious punishment as I have pounded on it to try and convince some of the unconvinceable that they are being bamboozled by these pro ACC folks.

I surf through their links in their posts on the discussions and try to find actual 'climate scientists' - known better as 'atmospheric physicists'. I'm looking for some actual scientists - the atmospheric kind - the kind who's reputation will take a beating if they are wrong about this whole Greenhouse Gas thingy- the kind of words that have responsibility behind them.

It turns out, in my previous look at qualifications of 'qualified folks' that most of the so called environmental scientists are actually sociologists and biologists. A sociologist or biologist won't take a beating if he or she is wrong about atmospheric physics "I got bamboozled just like everyone else", they can always say.

I found an article in the Guardian...ha ha!! Real climate scientists at last ! Because I would rather believe the AGW hypothesis is true than what I do actually believe. I want to be convinced that the AGW hypothesis is true because I would be a lot happier if I did. What I think is far worse. What I think makes me ashamed to be a member of this species.

Part of what makes me ashamed to be a member of the species is that I cannot get anyone from the pro AGW /ACC camp to go here PetitionProject I think its because they are afraid. Cult members are going to be afraid of things like this and this too. You can't get them to look at what real climate scientists are saying. They live in a world of smoke, mirrors and politics. Their cult leaders have warned them about going to sites like these.

But I look, I looked at the Guardian and was thinking "Oh good....I was wrong..." But I wasn't.

Maybe if I can show them once again how they are being bamboozled..instead of taking stupid Liberal insults and having those take the place of intelligent argument.

So, lets see what constitutes Climate Scientist in the mind of a Cult Member. The Guardian has an article entitled: Climate Consensus: The 97 %. So lets see...

(1)Dr. Catherine Potvin, Professor, Department of Biology  Ok Ok.  So you don't always get it right the first time..so lets try it again.

(2)Dr. Chantelle Richmond, Western University - dept of Geography. Twice the charm...

(3)Dr. Fikret Berkes, University of Manitoba - Natural Resources.  Never give up

(4)Dr. Mark Stoddart, Memorial University - Dept of Sociology. I think we may find one actual physicist, but I'm not betting on it. Keep trying. Never give up...

(5) Dr. Sally Aitken, University of British Columbia - Forest Genetics

(6)  Dr. Aerin Jacob, University of Victoria: - Applied Conservation Science

(7) Dr. Alison Kemper, Ryerson University - Marketing

(8) Dr. André Potvin, Université Laval- Architecture

(9) Dr. Andreas Heyland, University of Guelph - Comparative physiology

(10) Dr. Ann Dale, Royal Roads - University Canada Research Chair in Sustainable Community Development

(11) Dr. Ashlee Cunsolo Willox, Cape Breton University - Nursing & Indigenous Studies

(12) Dr. Brent Sinclair - biologist

(13) Dr. Bruno Dyck, University of Manitoba - Business administration

There is a bit of  trend here, I don't think we are going to see a world class climate scientist in this group. The qualifications seem to be diverging into fields where one may not even be required to know what climate even is.

So if the sky is falling and the earth will die unless we let the banks and their UN start telling us what we can and cannot have for energy while they fly around in private jets, I want to hear it from an actual Climate Scientist !!!

Friday, September 19, 2014

Naomi Shocking Us Into Green Communism Based on AGW fraud

Naomi Klein, author of the famous book, The Shock Doctrine, showed us the value of shock in leading us into the fraudulent war on terror. She has written another book, using the methods given in The Shock Doctrine to shock us into United Nations Agenda 21 based on the phoney AGW threat.

The Rhodes Scholar seems to have followed lessons that she learned from the US Neocons to shock us into helping the global financiers in establishing their Neoliberal Green communist agenda (Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development) New World Order.

She has an interview of the Ford Foundation funded Democracy Now! Here

So you don't have to buy her stupid book.

She says we must transform the economy to reduce "emissions" - of carbon, I assume. I think the only emissions we need to worry about are those emanating from people like Naomi Klein.

Its important to know that burning hydrocarbons has the by products of water and carbon dioxide. (That "smoke" you see coming out of "smoke stacks" of Western clean burning coal burning plants in AGW propaganda is actually water). Both of these are life giving gases.

In the Chinese coal plants? Who knows. They don't have regulations over there and the Neoliberal Rhodes Scholar isn't pushing for trade sanctions against China and their slave factories to reduce real harmful rather than imaginary harmful emissions that are the result of by-products emitted by dirty plants without 'scrubbers'.

Naomi's argument is a scientific one - we must stop putting "carbon", meaning CO2, into the environment to stop global warming. Really CO2 isn't bad for the environment according to qualified folks.

The science behind the pro AGW movement has always been political science and the science behind the anti AGW movement has always been the hard kind.You don't see qualified folks like this on Naomi's side of things, you see people like....well....Naomi. They always say they have qualified people behind them, you just never hear from these qualified people. They have corporate media to repeat their mantra until it gets believed.

The rest of the interview is such BS that I can't even pollute my keyboard by repeating it here. She says "We must invest more in the public sphere...." - just to warn you. You won't believe it if I just write it all here anyhow. See for yourself at the Ford Foundation media outlet linked above.


About Me

My Photo
Author of "Power Outage", available on Smashwords. I am a 50 year old free market libertarian who has had the time to read and consider the nature of globalism and the big machine that is surrounding us. I have participated in politics by running at the Fed level and debated Agenda 21 and 9-11 truth in front of large audiences. My background is in engineering and software creation. My business has provided me with significant time and freedom to learn the truth about the world around us. My goal is to expose Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development and Cultural Marxism.